Have thoughts on this or another subject? If so, contact me. Use them confidently to guide you in developing your next presentation, maybe on the Loch Ness monster. How simple it would have been to correct these mistakes a long time ago if only you had known. Some of you are probably looking a little ashen. Most important, slides support him and his key message, not the other way around. Notice that he only speaks to a few of the slides. His slides are simple, elegant, beautiful, and not distracting. For proof, watch Garr Reynolds, author of “Presentation Zen,” share “Lessons from Bamboo” at TEDx Tokyo 2011 – 68 slides in 12 minutes. It’s not the number of slides that’s the problem it’s how they’re used. I was a believer in this one after years of speakers who ran 40 minutes overtime. Instead, start with a clean slide and think about how you could best express your point with a very simple two-dimensional graph, a word or two or a photograph that goes right to the edges. And what comes next on the standard template? Right, bullets. The headline alone breaks the “Rule of One Point per Slide” I discussed in my last post. Templates stifle your ability to create slides that achieve their objective. Each slide says to listeners that you’re not the authority they were hoping to hear, but a shill for your employer parroting the company line. It’s not only a wasted distraction, and it can harm you’re credibility with external audiences. This sounds logical, and raise your hand if you’ve been swayed by this subliminal tactic. Put your logo on every slide to reinforce your brand. Much better, practice until you know your material.ĥ. ![]() If you need them, crib notes are for 3×5 cards or a teleprompter. Your audience will follow your eyes directly to the slides and away from you. ![]() Your slides should be a backdrop, emphasizing the points you’re making. The promise of this method was that you could talk extemporaneously, no practice necessary. I’d step up to an easel pad, jot down my points and then speak to them. I learned to make presentations this way. Here are the final four biggest presentation slide myths – busted:Ĥ. If you can make the transition, you’ll become the star of your show and get your message across much more resoundingly than you ever thought possible. Today, I’m going to take another shot at what you held to be true, sometimes for decades about presentation slides. I won’t even mention all of those who wondered where I got my information on crop circles. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT), Same daymaximum 24 hours1, 7 days2, 30 days, 60 days, It is recommended to track performance. Some of you may be having trouble getting your heads around presentations with no bullets, no spreadsheets or Fourth-of-July dissolves. In my last post, I exposed three of the biggest frauds perpetrated on the business speaker. All rights reserved.Rid your slide presentations of long-held business lore These outcomes will serve as a benchmark for the ongoing Symptom Control-24 randomized trial comparing 24 Gy in 2 SBRT fractions to 20 Gy delivered in 5 daily conventional fractions.Ĭopyright © 2018 The Author(s). Twenty-four Gray in 2 daily fractions is safe and effective in achieving high tumor control rates for de novo spinal metastases. 0085) were significant predictors for VCF. 0121), and the dose to 90% of the planning target volume (P =. The cumulative risk of VCF at 1 and 2 years was 8.5% and 13.8%, respectively. Only the presence of epidural disease predicted for LF (P <. ![]() The 1-year and 2-year LF rates were 9.7% and 17.6%, respectively, and the median time to LF was 9.2 month (range, 0.4-31.3 months). 0034) were significant prognostic factors for OS. 0001) primary histologies and baseline diffuse metastases (P =. The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 73.1% and 60.7%, respectively. The median follow-up per treated metastasis was 15.0 months (range, 0.1-71.6). The endpoints were overall survival (OS), imaging-based local failure (LF), and cumulative risk of vertebral compression fractures (VCF). The cohort consisted of 279 de novo spinal metastases in 145 consecutive patients treated with 24 Gy in 2 SBRT fractions, identified from a prospective single-institution database. We report mature outcomes for a cohort of patients with no prior radiation (de novo) to the spine treated with 24 Gy in 2 daily fractions for metastases, which represents the same stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) regimen under evaluation in the current Symptom Control-24 phase 3 randomized trial ( NCT02512965).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |